Is Racism Natural?

edited February 2010 in General
Seems like a pretty simple question, but I recently had a debate with my friend about it. I said it's an evolutionary tendency...and he says it's an invention of society. I want you guys to to what you do best: Find as much evidence as you can for either side and duke this out. Here's what I've got so far...
Yes, every single person is prejudice to some degree whether or not they want to admit it or even realize it. We all prefer people who are more similar to us. Numerous experiments have been conducted on prejudice and people exhibit certain unintentional behaviors which clearly illustrate contemporary prejudice to the trained eye.
It is a natural reaction that may be influenced, but not necessarily created by surroundings.

P.S. Racism is NOT by any means created by man. There are supporting studies and evidence that proves that even animals (like mockingbirds, squirrels, and etc) prefer their own kind, or their own kin. They will feed babies who are closely related but neglect those who are not. That is just one example of non-human related "prejudice."
In the early days of humanity, racism was a good thing because we were tribal animals. If you saw something, or someone to be more exact different than you, they weren't part of the pack, and proved to be a threat to you and your family. Thats where racism began, so we hated other sub-divisons of humanity.

http://layscience.net/?q=node/152
http://www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/baby-monkey-faces/
Survival. In general, attractive people have more "normal" features and therefore better genes. By staring up with your big blue eyes at the hottest person in the room, you are assuming that's your mommy, or at least hoping that turning on the charm will make her adopt you. Being raised by someone healthy gives you a better chance of living to see your first birthday. The baby-racism makes sense as well from an evolutionary perspective: It's important as you get older to know who all the people in your tribe are, but that other tribe down the way? According to the studies, all you need to know is they don't look like you. Their individual features? Irrelevant in your tiny, racist baby mind.

Comments

  • edited February 2010
    First off, I think racism is a pretty broad term that could be a bit vague.

    Secondly, I think it's natural up to a certain extent. I definitely don't think it's an "invention of society", since that's not how the concept of society works (at least for me): if person A dislikes blacks or hispanics or asians because of their ethnicity it is A's decision and not society's. Even if you were to say that A dislikes these ethnicities because of what he sees on the media or what the people around him are like, it still is A's individual conduct that is racist because of what he as an individual has made of what he sees on the media and his surroundings. You can't blame such a diffuse concept as "society" for A's fault.
  • edited February 2010
    We've definitely seen racism created on a societal or cultural level. Look at the treatment of the Japanese in the wake of World War II; while they may not have been on completely equal standing in American society prior to the war, they became reviled after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The same thing happened more recently with eastern cultures post-9/11.
  • edited February 2010
    Given that most of us are likely white and have grown up in white dominated societies, this may be a difficult question for us to fully grasp. I remember something a friend posted on his blog many years ago about this issue. He is an Asian American, but as he was young he was completely unaware that he was not white. His classmates were white, but he, even as a fairly darker skinned Asian, never really made the connection until he was somewhere in middle school. Interpret that as you will.

    Kids themselves though can be fairly mean. I know that here in East Asia, in countries with very high rates of homogenity, kids are fairly discriminatory and unforgiving of children different from them. They get beat up, excluded from activities, bullied, etc. If I were to marry a local here, I certainly would not send my halfbreed offspring to public schools. But then again, is this because kids learn the value of their race at an early age in school, or is it something deeper than that?

    Does it happen as much in the US in elementary school? I spent my elementary and middle school years in Minneapolis and Dallas, both of which are fairly mixed. My high school years in Iowa were very... Aryan. Like 2/3 of my classes had kids with blue eyes and/or blonde hair.
  • edited February 2010
    kukopanki wrote: »
    Secondly, I think it's natural up to a certain extent. I definitely don't think it's an "invention of society", since that's not how the concept of society works (at least for me): if person A dislikes blacks or hispanics or asians because of their ethnicity it is A's decision and not society's. Even if you were to say that A dislikes these ethnicities because of what he sees on the media or what the people around him are like, it still is A's individual conduct that is racist because of what he as an individual has made of what he sees on the media and his surroundings. You can't blame such a diffuse concept as "society" for A's fault.

    I dunno, I feel like it's a bit off to fully discount social mechanisms (media, family, religion, education) like this. A lot of it DOES come from the individual, to be sure, but I think the way you're setting it up here downplays the extraordinary external influence that every person is under from the moment they're born. It's pretty much impossible for someone to grow up and THEN make completely a priori decisions about what the world around her is like. Everyone's view on the world, even the most 'enlightened,' is influenced by what they were taught as they were raised.

    Obviously anyone can overcome it, but a lot of people don't, so I think that thinking of it as a mixture of human instinct to group things according to common characteristics and influence from certain social constructs is probably the most accurate.

    Of course, the SHAPE of racism, I think you could argue, is pretty much set by what we've seen and been told as we've grown up. I don't think it's in any way instinctive for a white person to think that all Asians are good at math, and so on and so forth.
  • edited February 2010
    I'm gonna have to go with Andrew on this. I'd say it's a combination of things. People do have a sort of primal prejudice as a sort of defense and a learning tool. This gets fed a bit by information gathered via "society". However it is up to the individual whether and what to accept or reject. They can choose to associate a behavior/trait with an individual or to a group they associate with that individual.
  • edited February 2010
    Although I think that it's not really something that you can fully "choose." You can attempt to resist it, but I feel like if you're raised a certain way it's really hard to eliminate all traces of it... it will always inform part of you.
  • edited February 2010
    2zqvrdv.png