You'd have to ask Geoff about that, but it generally boils down to:
-100 panels is a lot of panels, so don't expect it to be done any time soon.
-It's Witch's Brew, so really don't expect it to be done any time soon.
Witch's Brew truly is a spare time sort of effort. We're not gonna take the time to give you a running tally, that just doesn't seem to be an efficient use of energy. Patience = virtue, people!
Also, to the Brew participants: the secret webpage that lists whose turn it is more often than not is horribly outdated, because it has to be manually changed by Geoff. Don't depend on it as being accurate and live, 'cause it ain't.
Okay. I wasn't sure, what with Agentcel giving us some random percent, and then whatever John said getting him banned. I mean, he could have been telling us no, but in a horribly offensive manner (which wouldn't surprise me at all). Thanks for a concrete answer.
The first clue would have been that John edited his own post with the banning message.
Not possible unless he has access to MacJake's account: he can't edit anything to appear underneath his own signature, and that edit tag only appears in that one post, so it's not part of the signature. Therefore it's a genuine edit tag.
Not possible unless he has access to MacJake's account: he can't edit anything to appear underneath his own signature, and that edit tag only appears in that one post, so it's not part of the signature. Therefore it's a genuine edit tag.
Or maybe he just payed Macjake to do it. Payed him with sex rolls.
mjc, the post originally was cleverly doctored to look like I edited it. Then Jakey edited it, and it had double edits (since the first one form me was fake). The mario edit was subsequently removed so it wouldn't look fishy.
What happened is that I edited John's post to see how he got the fake Mario Edit line in it, and I fucked up somehow and it left my edit mark on it. For a while it had two edit marks, until I got the bright idea of removing Mario's, so only mine remained and it looked like a legitimate banning.
Uh, that gives the exact same information. Be patient, it's less annoying to the rest of us that way. And don't whine about Brew delays in the forum; if you want to check on the status of a Brew you're participating in, contact geoko directly, either via PM, IM or e-mail.
Dude, come on. It's so simple, all you have to do is divide the 6% into the 100, but brews cycle around, as in a circle, so then you multiply with Pi and square the answer. But, since there's always a chance of the project stopping before it's reached all 100 of the initally intended brews, we must solve it in terms of the limit as X aproaches N, if X=the latest brew completed and N=the total number of brews to be completed. So, it's like, 17 or something.
Comments
-100 panels is a lot of panels, so don't expect it to be done any time soon.
-It's Witch's Brew, so really don't expect it to be done any time soon.
Witch's Brew truly is a spare time sort of effort. We're not gonna take the time to give you a running tally, that just doesn't seem to be an efficient use of energy. Patience = virtue, people!
Also, to the Brew participants: the secret webpage that lists whose turn it is more often than not is horribly outdated, because it has to be manually changed by Geoff. Don't depend on it as being accurate and live, 'cause it ain't.
Okay. I wasn't sure, what with Agentcel giving us some random percent, and then whatever John said getting him banned. I mean, he could have been telling us no, but in a horribly offensive manner (which wouldn't surprise me at all). Thanks for a concrete answer.
Not possible unless he has access to MacJake's account: he can't edit anything to appear underneath his own signature, and that edit tag only appears in that one post, so it's not part of the signature. Therefore it's a genuine edit tag.
Or maybe he just payed Macjake to do it. Payed him with sex rolls.
Sorry for ruining the joke, John!
ARE THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS?
*Sully sully sully*
*smites scott*
I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!
Edit: Also, is the current brewer still Elijah Fleming? If so, it has been for the last month.
Okay, just for that I will tell the public that [highlight]*removed*[/highlight] of the brews are made.
uh, what? that's a weird edit to make, and now i'm confused.
EDIT: ..and especially not in public. You have all our email addresses.