SCIENCE! PROJECT IDEAS?

2

Comments

  • edited November 2007
    How about how much jiggling would be appropriate for a pair of breasts to be attractive? Can a woman have more or less than two breasts and still be attractive? How about the kind of nipple, say, plain or puffy nipples? There's a lot to be found out from the SCIENCE! of breasts, and I would like to know if anyone here would like to aid me in my experiments.
    These are still up for grabs.
  • edited November 2007
    I feel insulted. I am a girl and even if this was a viable science fair project the first girl to see it, (and more than likely it will be his mother) will hurt him. This is a sexist comment that I find personally insulting.

    I'm insulted by the sheer idiocy and feigned self-righteous indignation of this post. If you want to get all huffy over something from THE INTERNET as trivial as this perhaps you would be better suited elsewhere.

    ETA: Breasts are awesome.
  • edited November 2007
    Come on, Jake, she's like 15.
  • edited November 2007
    Sounds like the Professor is out to do some SCHOOLIN!
  • edited November 2007
    Actually, according to her profile she's 14. I was just assuming she was joking or just a huge hypocrite. She's got "All I'm telling you is that I only like my Profile picture because it has 3 hot guys in it" for her Biography and "Videogames, Zelda, Writing stories, Waffles, and my Profile Picture" for her interests. She obviously sees no problem with objectifying the opposite sex.
  • edited November 2007
    I'm noticing a distinct lack of hot guys in her profile.

    =(
  • edited November 2007
    I'm assuming the picture was updated without any correlating updates to the rest of the profile.
  • edited November 2007
    Yeah, but she's like 14. Weren't we all hypocritical sacks of hormonal crap back then? I mean, I know I still AM.
  • edited November 2007
    By 14 I had already subscribed to my philosophy of avoiding hypocrisy at all costs. I wasn't perfect, but I was aware of that fact, and avoided any activity or habit of which I disapproved in others.
  • edited November 2007
    Well then I nominate you for Pope.
  • edited November 2007
    No. That'd be no good. I simply hold myself to the same standards I hold others. I certainly don't hold anyone to the standards of Pope.
  • edited November 2007
    Besides, he'd have to kill the current Pope and that'd kinda disqualify him for the job anyway.
  • edited November 2007
    No one said he'd have to do the deed.

    Just make sure nothing can be traced back, then you're set.
  • edited November 2007
    Aren't Popes like Highlanders, though? You have to kill one to absorb his power?
  • edited November 2007
    Yes, but if the pope dies of natural causes all that pomp and ceremony they use to choose the next pope captures his power and holds it until the new pope arrives.
  • edited November 2007
    There's your science project! Absorb the holy powers of the pope. Then you can wield the power of a god.
  • edited November 2007
    Hey, I'm the expert on being 14 here!
    EDIT: whoops. skipped a page.
  • edited November 2007
    But you're a dude. 14 year old males and 14 year old females are two very different beings.
  • edited November 2007
    Elaborate on that!

    EDIT:
    HAMELIN wrote: »
    Test the science of COCKS.

    (hee hee)
    You trying to say somethin, punk?
  • edited November 2007
    Elaborate on it? Umm... well. Males and females are different biologically, and those differences start to come about in junior high/high school. They affect each gender differently. Also, society treats males and females in different ways, and what you've been taught vs. what you start to find out on your own really starts to clash during that age. And since males and females are taught different things, you get some different things going on.

    Of course, there are a lot of similarities between the genders, especially if you look at individuals. But overall, I think there's a lot going on that isn't shared between genders.
  • godgod
    edited November 2007
    The biggest difference between males and females is that females only have half of a soul, making males vastly superior. Now, this gets interesting with ginger kids, as they have no soul to begin with, so the females actually have half of an anti-soul. There's some very interesting studies going on regarding this, you should look some up.
  • edited November 2007
    Ahh, that explains why women are crazy. Thanks God! You should be pope!
  • edited November 2007
    I can't believe it. You guys figured out the secrets of womankind. I do only have half a soul, and I've been shot several times, and I've NEVER DIED!!!!! But thank you for the complliment, my friends and I greatly appreciate being called any type of insane.
  • edited November 2007
    EVERYBODY is at least a little crazy. That has nothing to do being a woman. If we weren't crazy we'd be robots.
  • edited November 2007
    YEAH?

    iLlr_1196267697_9jhU_1196267467_futurama_roberto.png
  • edited December 2007
    I must say, for a section of a website devoted to science, and (as is implied intelligence) you people are very dense.
  • edited December 2007
    Why are you still talking about this?
  • edited December 2007
    Huh. You know, given your track record, I really don't know how to interpret this remark. Either you're just joking around (in which case, welcome to the party), or you're serious. If that's the case, you really need to lighten up. Seriously. Half of this forum is just friendly banter you need to roll with.
  • godgod
    edited December 2007
    for a section of a website devoted to science
    This isnt devoted to science. This is devoted to SCIENCE! Although this thread is lacking a bit in that section, I don't think anyone even mentioned zombies, lasers, or murderous robots.

    Edit: Build a robot that shoots lasers that zombify people.
  • edited December 2007
    I must say, for a section of a website devoted to science, and (as is implied intelligence) you people are very dense.

    Wow! You sure got us pegged. Please explain, in the smallest words possible, exactly what we were too dense to pick up. I don't recall you presenting any innuendo or clever commentary. Was your lame whining supposed to have some hidden double entendre? I think you're just making vague comments in an effort to seem more substantial than you actually are. If you're actually complaining about sexism, shut up, I already called you on your hypocrisy and nobody wants to here you bitch anyway. If you are calling us dense because you were actually joking and we couldn't tell, again, shut up. All we know is what you write. Unless you use some sort of obvious sarcasm or a smiley or anything aside from pure stupidity, there is no way we can know with what emotion you are typing your thoughts.