I like Ron Paul. Who Knew?

2

Comments

  • edited December 2007
    AGH this is why I want a benevolent dictatorship.

    Oxymoronic that, mate. To quote Lord Acton: "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely."
  • edited December 2007
    FDR was a benevolent dictator.
  • edited December 2007
    Yeah, you hear that? FUCK YOU, Bruce.
  • edited December 2007
    Yeah, you hear that? FUCK YOU, Bruce.

    Mr. Speaker, I move that the honourable gentleman be suspended from the chamber for continued use of unparliamentary language.
  • edited December 2007
    WE'RE IN NO FUCKING PARLIAMENT GOSH
  • edited December 2007
    They can actually get kicked out for using bad language? When Congress meets, they're literally exempt from just about anything short of murder.
  • edited December 2007
    You're exempt from a lot in parliament too. You cannot be arrested while in the chamber, you can commit as much libel as you want and cannot be sued, but if you swear a lot they get pissed off.

    You however may not die while in the chamber. That's a real law and everything.
  • edited January 2008
    Your country is silly!
  • edited January 2008
    Your FACE is silly!
  • edited January 2008
    Serephel wrote: »
    Your country is silly!

    Your country is silly! One day you'll see sense and adopt a parliamentary government!
  • edited January 2008
    Poppycock!
  • edited January 2008
    Night Lord wrote: »
    Your country is silly! One day you'll see sense and adopt a parliamentary government!
    Or just be conquered by one. It's only a matter of time, really.
  • edited January 2008
    Ugh, I read the first line from Ron Paul's essay ("Through perverse court decisions and years of cultural indoctrination, the elitist, secular Left") and I had to close the page. Anyone who uses an expression like that can't be taken seriously in my opinion
  • edited January 2008
    Conspiracy theories seem to be popular among politicians. There's always some large, unified organization with a sinister motive.

    Why are they elitist, anyway? Isn't it kinda elitist to say that your religion should have prominence over others?
  • edited January 2008
    Censoring Christmas is still censorship. I totally agree with Ron Paul on that. What I don't agree with is a House Simple Resolution saying how sweet it is. I want my religion to be transparent to my government. =[
  • edited January 2008
    Lol at how in the US the left is basically gays and abortions, while the right is nothing but absolute dogmatism and creationism.
  • edited January 2008
    I'd argue but you are right.
  • edited January 2008
    So, are undecided voters people who have had God tell them to get an abortion?
  • edited January 2008
    I don't like how I have to read Serephel saying "poppycock" every time I go to read this thread.
  • edited January 2008
    kukopanki wrote: »
    Lol at how in the US the left is basically gays and abortions, while the right is nothing but absolute dogmatism and creationism.

    That would be the left and right of any nation anywhere. Those are indeed the extremes. Communism vs. Fascism. Most people fall somewhere in the middle. Generally referred to as moderate left/right. And as always, it's the extremists making the most noise.
  • edited January 2008
    Actually, America doesn't really have an extreme left, at least not one with any kind of political power. Your parties are basically the right-leaning centrist Democrats and extreme whacko loony Republicans.

    Hell, American politicians on both sides of the aisle tend to treat "liberal" as a dirty word.
  • edited January 2008
    So, Ron Paul beat out Giuliani in the Iowa Caucus. Of course, he only got 5th place, but still.
  • edited January 2008
    And Giuiliani strangely didn't bother to campaign in Iowa at all.
  • edited January 2008
    I like Giuliani. He made New York City less life-threatening.
  • edited January 2008
    I liked Giuliani too, when he was mayor of New York. but his campaign to be president has largely consisted of "I saved the world in the wake of 9/11" and "Every minute without me to completely control every aspect of American life means that the evil terrorists will kill you and rape your dead bodies and kill you again!" I never even fathomed that someone would play the fear card more than Bush, but along came Rudy.
  • edited January 2008
    Behemoth wrote: »
    That would be the left and right of any nation anywhere. Those are indeed the extremes. Communism vs. Fascism. Most people fall somewhere in the middle. Generally referred to as moderate left/right. And as always, it's the extremists making the most noise.

    Actually, no. I was obviously using broad stereotypes, but those aren't the stereotypes here. In Ecuador (stereotypical) left is all Anti-Imperialism, Anti-USA, Revolución o Muerte (Revolution or Death), we're poor because they are rich, and that kind of conspiracy theories and crap. Right, on the other side, isn't very defined but is basically "private and/or foreign investion, lol"
  • edited January 2008
    Where are you getting your final numbers from for the caucus?
  • edited January 2008
    Actually, America doesn't really have an extreme left, at least not one with any kind of political power. Your parties are basically the right-leaning centrist Democrats and extreme whacko loony Republicans.

    Hell, American politicians on both sides of the aisle tend to treat "liberal" as a dirty word.
    I've heard that the most conservative Canadian leader is still liberal by US standards.
    kukopanki wrote: »
    Actually, no. I was obviously using broad stereotypes, but those aren't the stereotypes here. In Ecuador (stereotypical) left is all Anti-Imperialism, Anti-USA, Revolución o Muerte (Revolution or Death), we're poor because they are rich, and that kind of conspiracy theories and crap. Right, on the other side, isn't very defined but is basically "private and/or foreign investion, lol"

    I was being rather general myself, I honestly know nothing of Ecuador. That left side still sounds close to Communism to me, but that right doesn't sound as far right as you would consider the US, I suppose.
  • edited January 2008
    Behemoth wrote: »
    I've heard that the most conservative Canadian leader is still liberal by US standards.
    The most conservative leaders pretty much anywhere in the developed would other than the US is fairly liberal by US standards.

    America's just screwy.