Mario vs Geoko

2

Comments

  • edited August 2008
    Geoko has already shown support for a workable plan for what to do with our non-living citizens, namely uploading the remains of their personalities into robotic bodies so that they would no longer need brains and be able to live in space. Mario believes that we can simply co-exist with things that wish to consume us all.

    Mario: Wrong on zombies, wrong for the Orange Belt.
  • edited August 2008
    ((LOL wow, that's money.))
  • edited August 2008
    You know who else felt the need to get rid of a sizable portion of the population whose only crime was being different, and that a frightened and prejudiced majority felt didn't deserve to live?

    Mario: Not a fan of Hitler, like some other candidates
  • edited August 2008
    Can I vote for Jakey?
  • edited August 2008
    Kyle wrote: »
    How can it be genocide when they are already dead? answer me that.

    A vote for Geoff is a vote for freedom!

    Here's the real question: if you yourself were to expire and rise again as a zombie, would you wish society to turn its back on you, to deny you your God-given rights and privileges you maintained throughout life? Mr. Kottmeier would turn his back on you, or possibly blow your head off with a shotgun. I have a comprehensive plan to help rehabilitate our zombie population and make them functioning members of society. Of course, brain-eating will not be tolerated, just as we would not allow it for living citizens, but to brutally and violently re-murder your fellow forumites is simply inexcusable. Our modern society can no longer condone this rampant bigotry! A vote for me is a vote for equal rights for all men, regardless of race, creed or pulse!
  • edited August 2008
    What about women? You've mentioned equal rights for all men several times now. Don't you feel women deserve equal rights, as well?

    A vote for mario is a vote to put women back in the kitchen. Vote for Geoff.
  • edited August 2008
    Braaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinssssssss!!!!!
  • edited August 2008
    I use "men" in the classical sense of referring to "people". The word does not have an inherent masculine connotation. However, if anyone else interpreted it in this way, I do apologize for the misunderstanding.
  • edited August 2008
    See? Mario just said he doesn't even think of women as people!
  • edited August 2008
    Behemoth wrote: »
    A vote for mario is a vote to put women back in the kitchen. Vote for Geoff.

    All the more reason to vote for Mario, then!

    I can't believe I just said that.
  • edited August 2008
    You didn't. You typed it.
    mario wrote: »
    I use "men" in the classical sense of referring to "people". The word does not have an inherent masculine connotation. However, if anyone else interpreted it in this way, I do apologize for the misunderstanding.

    Well, I don't think zombies are included at all in the classical sense. How can we trust anything you say when you just flip-flop to dodge questions.

    A vote for mario is a vote for indecision. Vote for Geoff, a solid leader.
  • edited August 2008
    I stand firm in the decisions I make, and in my convictions, and in my stances on the important issues. A person is a person throughout their existence, until true and final death separates them from this mortal coil permanently. If a person can be reanimated, then I contend that they are still a person, and should be treated as such.
  • edited August 2008
    So you think that anything labeled as a "non-person" is less important?
  • edited August 2008
    Anything that is not a person, under current laws, does not have the same rights as a person. This is not necessarily my opinion on the matter, but it is what the law says. However, this does not indicate a lesser importance.
  • edited August 2008
    And under current laws, zombies are not considered people, therefore, they have no right to vote.
  • edited August 2008
    mario wrote: »
    Anything that is not a person, under current laws, does not have the same rights as a person.
  • edited August 2008
    I have found no law that specifically bars zombies from voting, for there is no law that removes a person's personhood upon death. Therefore, zombies, under the law, are people. My opponent would change these laws and thereby deny a zombie its basic rights simply by merit of its having been reanimated.
  • edited August 2008
    What of the current speculation that you, in fact, hate kittens?
  • edited August 2008
    mario wrote: »
    Here's the real question: if you yourself were to expire and rise again as a zombie, would you wish society to turn its back on you, to deny you your God-given rights and privileges you maintained throughout life?
    No, I wish to be placed into a robot body so that I could live in space, and I don't think I'm alone with that wish.

    I feel it's my duty to inform the Orange Belt of what they're truly voting for when they cast their ballot for mario.
  • edited August 2008
    What of the current speculation that you, in fact, hate kittens?

    Forgive me, my opponent's spurious statement to this effect was edited into his post after my previous reply, and I did not immediately see it as of press time.

    My love of kittens is well-documented. During my illustrious career, I have owned many kittens and loved them all as I would love any family member. Mr. Kottmeier is either confused about my words or is deliberately attempting to distort them for his own twisted ends, and I'm not sure which is more disturbing. My stating that the current laws afford less rights to non-persons has no bearing on my opinions toward said non-persons.
    I feel it's my duty to inform the Orange Belt of what they're truly voting for when they cast their ballot for mario.

    I have never scaryrolled someone without their express permission.
  • edited August 2008
    mario wrote: »
    Forgive me, my opponent's spurious statement to this effect was edited into his post after my previous reply, and I did not immediately see it as of press time.

    ((actually... that's not true. more glitches yay! i did cut out some text, but the pic was there all along. and it was before you wrote your response.))

    :objection:

    Outrageous lies! My opponent is blaming me for his inane babblings without reason! Also, note his flip flopping on the issue of non-human's rights! He's a waffler!
  • edited August 2008
    Sir, I have never wavered on any of these issues. If you would like to cite examples of this supposed "flip-flopping", I would be happy to address them, but I am finding it difficult to respond to your poorly-formed knee-jerk accusations.
  • edited August 2008
    You two have lost ALL sense of reality...


    ...and I LIKE it!!!
  • edited August 2008
    WAFFLER!!
  • edited August 2008
    These outbursts serve no purpose other than to divert the voter's attention from the real issues!
  • edited August 2008
    I totally didn't sway it to mario by one vote. Nope.
  • edited August 2008
    Well, fortunately for us all, this is only a preliminary vote. You still ahve time to change your response, Mr. Cel.
  • edited August 2008
    I will review the information given to me.
  • edited August 2008
    Vote canceled! There shall be no victory determined in THIS poll at this time.

    Geoko was my initial instinct afterall.
  • edited August 2008
    geoko wrote: »
    WAFFLER!!

    :objection: Waffles don't need to be flipped.