This post lacks an "e"

2

Comments

  • edited April 2010
    A good way to gain familiarity with synonyms is just to drift away in good books. A world of writing awaits you, and it's so grand.
  • edited April 2010
    If I was to apply a variant of this villainous symbol, is that a fail? Such as with a word that starts with "caf" and halts with said variant symbol?
  • edited April 2010
    It wouldn't actually contain a word of any sort in that form, my broshnizz.
  • edited April 2010
    Such Gallic symbols would badly stain your communication.
  • edited April 2010
    Gallic? Is that a Gallic symbol?
  • edited April 2010
    Serephel wrote: »
    How long will this OB group last until that villainous script is finally laid again for all to find?

    Not too long, my good ally:
    Mish42 wrote: »
    EDIT: Just to confirm, I did NOT actually look up anything in MS Word to think up more words for this post.
  • edited April 2010
    Woo! This is my 4000th post guys!
  • edited April 2010
    FUCK. I didn't think of that.

    Ryan, what a scandal! What about your plan to start a forum topic?
  • edited April 2010
    I thought about it, but I think that I will host a forum party at 5000 posts.
  • edited April 2010
    IRL, I am hoping.
  • edited April 2010
    I think so too, IRL is good. First to hit 5000 posts will host a party IRL. What do you think?

    Modification: All is ok, no typos in this post.
  • edited April 2010
    I think that is a good plan.
  • edited April 2010
    I think it sounds fantastic!
  • edited April 2010
    I find that composing posts without using such a common glyph is a bit difficult. How is it that this group pulls this off so brilliantly? (Except Ryan. His last dispatch contains this mark of horrors. A good chap should modify that.)

    Also, I'm down for a party. It sounds fun.
  • edited April 2010
    I don't know what you think you saw, but that post has no flaw.
  • edited April 2010
    You simply and kindly undid your wrong-doing according to Iguana's law.
  • edited April 2010
    XoLore wrote: »
    I find that composing posts without using such a common glyph is a bit difficult. How is it that this group pulls this off so brilliantly? (Except Ryan. His last dispatch contains this mark of horrors. A good chap should modify that.)

    Also, I'm down for a party. It sounds fun.

    I know now that I'm not the only OB punk who ruins almost all posts in this topic. I'm not such a failure now!

    Modification: Mario just said I lost, and I know that's right. I'm still full of fail. I admit it.
  • edited April 2010
    Serephel wrote: »
    I think so too, IRL is good. First to hit 5000 posts will host a party IRL. What do you think?

    I think that I concur. So basically I'm hosting said party. Which is cool with this guy!
  • edited April 2010
    Mish42 wrote: »
    I know now that I'm not the only OB punk who ruins almost all posts in this topic. I'm not such a failure now!
    Two slip-ups for you!

    I'm doing this class thing in which I gotta track all of my cash flow, and it looks as though I lost track of $1.91 during this past fortnight. I just can't think of what could occur to incur such a confusion.
  • edited April 2010
    1 word: prostitution. Two words: flagrant prostitution.
  • edited April 2010
    OBers: Surely enough time's been spent denying the letter 'e'. Let's engorge sentences! Surely we have adequate challenge here, since several key articles are forbidden under these rules! These changes require creative sentences! Disagree? Let the idea be vetoed, strike these utterances, be done. However, please let me continue here.
  • edited April 2010
    How about we don't use "i's"?
  • edited April 2010
    The challenge proposed three comments before me seems complicated yet easy enough! Let each member participate!
  • edited April 2010
    Challenges requiring me leaving 'e' absent seemed redonkulous enough. Ensuring everything includes 'e' inside makes these replies even harder.
  • edited April 2010
    As such an unabashedly locquacious individual, I find the proposed challenge by my old friend Andrew to be delightfully titilating! After reading the recorded successes of our forum patrons in conquering the first challenge of omitting the most critical letter in the English language from all posts, I am confident that this practice of 'engorging sentences' should prove both comical and intellectually stimulating!
  • edited April 2010
    Eh...
  • edited April 2010
    Agreed.
  • edited April 2010
    Weren't we agreeing the challenge required everything include the letter e instead? Maybe we're confused.
  • edited April 2010
    We're certainly clear regarding the new rules. Serephel enjoys being the dickhead.