Glorious first thread!

edited February 2007 in Dappled Records
FIRST POST! WOOT! Greetings to Carlo.
«1

Comments

  • edited February 2007
    The Glorious revolution of a barren subforum into a bustling utopia!
  • edited February 2007
    Utopia, eh? I can fix that.
  • edited February 2007
    By posting more horse porn?

    I joke, I joke, but you set yourself up for that one.
  • edited February 2007
    Utopia is boring! I demand chaos! Failing that, some idea of what sort of things are intended to be found on this particular forum would be quite nice.
  • edited February 2007
    I'll let Carlo explain it as he sees fit, which is probably more likely to happen when the site accompanying said forum goes live.

    In the meantime, what do you viewers at home think this forum is about? PEOPLE WHO ALREADY KNOW DO NOT GET TO ANSWER.
  • edited February 2007
    ooh! ooh! pick me! pick me! *raises hand and jumps around, then noticing the "PWAKDNGTA" stipulation and cries.*
  • godgod
    edited February 2007
    I shall guess it is about one or more records, which are more than likely dappled.
  • edited February 2007
    Perhaps some sort of musical discussion...
  • edited February 2007
    the records themselves are not dappled (nor spotted, freckled, or otherwise spotted).

    so, basically, i run and operate a record label called dappled records. currently, we release compact discs containing material recorded by my friends and i. i hope to have cds by bands that i am not in eventually, but we shall see. this forum will be used to discuss these releases and their related bands/musical projects.


    my guess is, the vast majority of the current orangebelters will not care much, but a few new members will join for this subforum. we may or may not stick around, depending on whether or not a forum seems like a good idea after the website goes up. just thought i'd give it a try.

    and, no horse porn plz.
  • edited February 2007
    Yeah, I'm gonna second the vote against horse porn.
  • edited February 2007
    That means you Agentcel.
  • edited February 2007
    Shut up...just...shut up, please. >.>

    EDIT: Nice reputation you guys are giving me...yeah I know it's my falut initially, but honestly...I ALSO DO A SPRITE COMIC CONTEST. Nice to meet you, Carlo.
  • edited February 2007
    What if the horse porn is tastefully done, and is meant to be the cover artwork for an album intended to be released on DAPPLED RECORDS?


    Also: This is good. We've been needing something like this for a while.
  • edited February 2007
    Resident sound geek, reporting for duty, sir!
  • edited February 2007
    EDITED: I didn't see that Carlo had called for a moratorium on horse porn jokes. Sorry for perpetrating them.
  • edited February 2007
    Please, we needn't have the first thread devolve like this. Having been informed of the purpose of this forum I must say with some regret that Carlo is correct that I don't care much. I believe my entire music collection consists of one old soundtrack and I don't even know where that CD is anymore. That said, I'm sure there are a good few here who would enjoy having a place to discuss things musical.
  • edited February 2007
    Is this thread about/from The Final Dimension?
  • edited February 2007
    See what kind of trouble you get me in Johnny?!

    I joke, I joke.
  • edited February 2007
    He's not the one who posted horsecocks.

    Yes, I am getting on the bandwagon.
  • edited February 2007
    Please stop posting about that!
  • edited February 2007
    Seriously, a first thread should be about making I good impression. Posting about the... oh, I'd say.... third darkest event in OB history isn't gonna help too much.

    Records are cool. Someday I'm gonna get a phonograph of my own. And also a rotary phone. They're retrolicious.
  • edited February 2007
    My friend is a DJ for a christian radio station, he does a techno music hour, so, he's pretty into records now.
  • edited February 2007
    i wish i could afford to press actual vinyl records instead of these stupid shiny metalic things...
  • edited February 2007
    Yeah, I wish I could afford to go back in time, too.
  • edited February 2007
    Hmm, this isn't a bad idea. I've worked a lot with local bands, hoping to get into the music industry more. I also dabble myself, particularly and obligatorily in guitar. Walk with me, talk with me, we have much to discuss.
  • edited February 2007
    KhanFusion wrote: »
    Yeah, I wish I could afford to go back in time, too.

    Bah! you can get records cut still, they're just expensive. By the way, watching the machines that master records work is A TRIP. I think fantasy studios in the SF still has one, despite their recent downsizing. oh, and screw vhinyl, 2 inch 24 track reel to reel is where its at. As the whippersnappers like to say, FTW. Try and argue, I'll smack you with a 25 pound reel of tape. Seriously though, once you go analog, you never go back.
  • edited February 2007
    All digital devices are made of analog parts. ):
  • edited February 2007
    All digital devices are made of analog parts. ):

    Meh, that's using the term in a rather odd way.
    Analog: of or pertaining to a mechanism that represents data by measurement of a continuous physical variable, as voltage or pressure.

    And it's irrelevant in terms of sound. Analog in sound is obviously rooted in "analogous", meaning that the recording is similar to the sound wave itself, such as pulses in light on film or variations in magnetism on tape or waves in a record. They are ways of capturing the actual wave as opposed to creating thousands of little snapshots which are of a limited variability. (16 bits, generally, though 24 is becoming more prevalent.) what once was a smooth wave now looks like stairs as you chart it over time. Don't believe me? play a reel to reel tape at half speed, the difference (other than the pitch dropping) is hardly noticeable. Try that with a digital recording and you'll hear all those lovely steps I was just talking about.

    right, i'm'a just be quiet now, I can go on for days about this.
  • edited February 2007
    geoko wrote: »
    right, i'm'a just be quiet now, I can go on for days about this.

    you can keep going, if you want... i'm at least interested.
  • edited February 2007
    I am utterly and totally confused. What's going on?