Seriously, boys...

13»

Comments

  • edited July 2008
    In the pants?
  • edited July 2008
    Well. maybe if they were as tight as Bowie's pants...
  • edited July 2008
    Mmmm.....

    Bowie pants.....
  • edited July 2008
    Hey guys, whats goin on in this thread? :)
    well, mish was wondering what men's opinions on breast size was, and i was just saying how my opinion is essentially 2 boobs is the best number to have, though I certainly wouldn't rule out 1 or 3 from being a good time. 4's goin' a bit far. Other than that, it's all good times, so who cares.

    And Bowie's area is teh bwst area.
  • edited July 2008
    geoko wrote: »
    It's a boobs thread.

    Tada.
  • edited July 2008
    Panda wrote: »
    What he said...
  • edited August 2008
    Sorry for the bump, but you guys have all the good threads while I'm gone!
  • edited August 2008
    sigh
  • edited August 2008
    double sigh.

    Agentcel, that very well might be, but you don't have to resuscitate a dead thread because of it, unless you have something to add to the conversation. You clearly don't. And saying you are sorry doesn't make your fault magically disappear.
  • edited August 2008
    So now he has to add something interesting to the conversation or be ridiculed?
  • edited August 2008
    Agentcel wrote: »
    Sorry for the bump, but you guys have all the good threads while I'm gone!

    It wasn't that great, actually. Are you going to contribute to the discussion, or just needlessly revive dead threads?
  • edited August 2008
    I'm pretty sure all he wanted to do was point out that we had a thread he would've wanted to contribute to, however what he would've said has been said, so instead he decided to point that out.

    I say you should be glad he didn't pm EVERYBODY, or make a new thread about it.
  • edited August 2008
    PMing is preferable. But closing dead threads is even more so! BOOYAH!