Official Introductory Thread Strikes Back

1246756

Comments

  • edited February 2006
    80's films still exist!

    You should be watching them as much as possible.

    They are delightfully bad.
  • godgod
    edited February 2006
    except for UHF
  • edited February 2006
    Clearly, not an 80's movie.
  • godgod
    edited February 2006
    *gasp* we've been bamboozled!
  • edited February 2006
    It's the same genre though. B-grade.

    Awesome comment on IMDB there:

    "Unbearable....its without a doubt the worst film I've ever seen....i couldn't stomach it all as i felt that to watch more would be to waste another hour of my life after the film i felt sick it was that bad...as my friend pointed out poorly lit rubbish. On top of that the gun fights were just terrible....every copy of this film should be seized rollered, burned, urinated on, then sent into space to go infect any attacking creatures with the worst horse kak that man kind can muster...then we should have all religions pray for redemption for us all for creating this rubbish......then knowone should be allowed to speak of this film again....ever........not like many people were in the first place to be fair. Maybe a slight over reaction but you can never be too careful....can you."
  • edited February 2006
    god wrote:
    except for UHF
    And Back to the Future.
  • edited February 2006
    Hey. Back to the Future is good. It also provides incontrovertible evidence on time travel, time machines, how the future will be and how the past was and all that kind of stuff.
  • godgod
    edited February 2006
    and, if you time travel, a relative will want to do you
  • edited February 2006
    And DMC Deloreans are awesome.
  • godgod
    edited February 2006
    and the road catches on fire if you time travel
  • edited February 2006
    Isn't it because the car accelerates so fast that the wheels can't keep up and the immense amount of friction catches the rubber left on the pavement on fire? How did it not melt the wheels off?
  • edited February 2006
    Why was the car cold to the touch after the first time travel, but not all the other times? The answer may not surprise you at all.
  • RonRon
    edited February 2006
    Hamelin wrote:
    Isn't it because the car accelerates so fast that the wheels can't keep up and the immense amount of friction catches the rubber left on the pavement on fire? How did it not melt the wheels off?

    It's the same reason wheels don't melt when driving through volcanic lava in the movie Dante's Peak

    Hello, I'm Ron. Zelda 2 is my favorite Zelda and The Orange Belt forums are my primary news source. :D
  • edited February 2006
    Hamelin wrote:
    Isn't it because the car accelerates so fast that the wheels can't keep up and the immense amount of friction catches the rubber left on the pavement on fire? How did it not melt the wheels off?
    No, because it also leaves flame trails when they time-travel while flying.
  • RonRon
    edited February 2006
    No, because it also leaves flame trails when they time-travel while flying.
    Air has friction too. That's why hard drives get warm.
  • edited March 2006
    Yes, but friction from the air wouldn't be concentrated at the wheels.
  • edited March 2006
    It would if the wheels were creating the most drag. The rest of the car was either aerodynamic enough or made of a material that heated, but was not soft enough to leave residue to burn in the atmosphere.
  • edited March 2006
    And besides, hard drives get warm because of all that delicious electricity running through them.... I'm guessing. I just imagine that amperes would create more heat than "air friction" in a computer.
  • edited March 2006
    The 18th century scientist Tony Babbage proved that air entering a PC is "crystalized" or made more rough by the process known as "semi-venticular ubiquitation". This increases friction and leads to heat buildup.

    :tmyk:
  • edited March 2006
    Your link went to a blank Wikipedia page.


    Man, I didn't think blank wikipedia pages existed anymore!
  • edited March 2006
    It was labelled a hoax and deleted.
  • edited March 2006
    So, yeah. I think I used to qualify as an Inksandwich regular. Then I had a baby, who devoured all my time and then pooped it out. And I have to change the diapers.

    Then she got older, and she was less greedy. So I checked on IS. Which just ain't the same without some certain kickass people. And then Jon told me about this place.

    So hi. I hereby claim the Resident Bisexual Mom title.
  • edited March 2006
    CURSES!

    I was aiming for that. The dental benefits are better.
  • edited March 2006
    I wouldn't bet on it.

    Also, I like the oranges theme.
  • edited March 2006
    Just wait until I finish mine up.

    It will have SCIENCE!y goodness.
  • edited March 2006
    So hi. I hereby claim the Resident Bisexual Mom title.
    All your kid's little future boyfriends are going to love you.
  • edited March 2006
    Ummmm... why? Because I'll be open-minded? Wouldn't that apply more to her girlfriends?
  • edited March 2006
    I think guys are supposed to find bisexuality sexy. And lesbianism even more so, paradoxically enough. Something to do with the unobtainable.
  • edited March 2006
    I think moreso when guys are young really, cause of all those hormones and the easily accessable adult material on the internet...

    Yeah, you should get Net Nanny or something.
  • edited March 2006
    True. God (or whoever) forbid my kids grow up to be like my siblings. I wouldn't so much mind their repeating MY mistakes, but my sister and brother... well, it's bad.

    Net Nanny's a thought.