Return of the Son of the Effed-Up News Thread Returns

15758606263106

Comments

  • edited May 2008
    Since when are brain tumors ever good?
  • edited May 2008
    I hear they can make you have visions about the future and so. That could be good, I guess.
  • edited May 2008
    Wait i think those are aneurysms.. Well I guess tumors can do the same.
  • edited May 2008
    Placed in the right person, they can make the media swarm over it as if nobody else has ever had a fucking tumor before.
  • edited May 2008
    Charity: Aid workers raping, abusing children
    LONDON, England (CNN) -- Humanitarian aid workers and United Nation peacekeepers are sexually abusing small children in several war-ravaged and food-poor countries, a leading European charity has said.

    Children as young as 6 have been forced to have sex with aid workers and peacekeepers in return for food and money, Save the Children UK said in a report released Tuesday.

    After interviewing hundreds of children, the charity said it found instances of rape, child prostitution, pornography, indecent sexual assault and trafficking of children for sex.

    "It is hard to imagine a more grotesque abuse of authority or flagrant violation of children's rights," said Jasmine Whitbread, chief executive of Save the Children UK.

    In the report, "No One To Turn To" a 15-year-old girl from Haiti told researchers: "My friends and I were walking by the National Palace one evening when we encountered a couple of humanitarian men. The men called us over and showed us their penises.

    "They offered us 100 Haitian gourdes ($2.80) and some chocolate if we would suck them. I said, 'No,' but some of the girls did it and got the money."

    Save the Children says that almost as shocking as the abuse itself is the "chronic under-reporting" of the abuses. It believes that thousands more children around the world could be suffering in silence.

    According to the charity, children told researchers they were too frightened to report the abuse, fearful that the abuser would come back to hurt them and that they would stop receiving aid from agencies, or even be punished by their family or community.

    "People don't report it because they are worried that the agency will stop working here, and we need them," a teenage boy in southern Sudan told Save the Children.

    The charity's research was centered on Ivory Coast, southern Sudan and Haiti, but Save the Children said the perpetrators of sexual abuse of children could be found in every type of humanitarian organization at all levels.

    Save the Children is calling for a global watchdog to tackle the problem and said it was working with the U.N. to establish local mechanisms that will allow victims to easily report abuse.

    "We are glad that Save the Children continues to shed a light on this problem. It actually follows up on a report that we did in 2002 with Save the Children. I think every population in the world has to confront this problem of exploitation and abuse of children," said Ron Redmond, chief spokesman for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Geneva, Switzerland.

    "The United Nations has a zero-tolerance policy. It's one that UNHCR takes very, very seriously. In refugee camps, we have implemented very strong reporting mechanisms so that refugees can come forward to report any abuses or alleged abuses."

    In 2003, U.N. Nepalese troops were accused of sexual abuse while serving in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Six soldiers were jailed.

    A year later, two U.N. peacekeepers were repatriated after being accused of abuse in Burundi, and U.N. troops were accused of rape and sexual abuse in Sudan.

    Last year, the U.N. launched an investigation into sexual abuse claims in Ivory Coast.

    The vast majority of aid workers were not involved in any form of abuse or exploitation but in "life-saving essential humanitarian work," Save the Children's Whitbread said.

    But humanitarian and peacekeeping agencies working in emergency situations "must own up to the fact that they are vulnerable to this problem and tackle it head on," she said.

    The aid agency said it had fired three workers for breaching its codes and called on others to do the same. The three men were dismissed in the past year for having had sex with girls aged 17, which the charity said is not illegal but is cause for loss of employment.

    Other UK charities said they supported Save the Children's call for a global watchdog.

    "Oxfam takes a zero-tolerance approach to sexual misconduct by its aid workers. All our staff across the world are held accountable by a robust code of conduct," said Jane Cocking, Oxfam charity's humanitarian director.

    "We support Save the Children's calls for a global watchdog. We will do all we can to stamp out this intolerable abuse."
  • edited May 2008
    That's gross. And sad.
  • edited May 2008
    TOS GUYZ R HIPPOCRITES
  • edited May 2008
    Horny hypocrites.
  • edited May 2008
    Dunkin' Donuts pulls Rachael Ray ad
    The coffee and donut chain says it yanked online spot to avoid 'misperception'; professor says links to extremism are narrow-minded and even racist.
    Last Updated: May 29, 2008: 5:29 PM EDT
    BOSTON (AP) -- Dunkin' Donuts has pulled an online advertisement featuring Rachael Ray after complaints that a fringed black-and-white scarf that the celebrity chef wore in the ad offers symbolic support for Muslim extremism and terrorism.

    The coffee and baked goods chain said the ad that began appearing online May 7 was pulled over the past weekend because "the possibility of misperception detracted from its original intention to promote our iced coffee."

    In the spot, Ray holds an iced coffee while standing in front of trees with pink blossoms.

    Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin complained that the scarf wrapped around her looked like a kaffiyeh, the traditional Arab headdress. ''The kaffiyeh, for the clueless, is the traditional scarf of Arab men that has come to symbolize murderous Palestinian jihad,'' Malkin wrote in her syndicated column.

    "Popularized by Yasser Arafat and a regular adornment of Muslim terrorists appearing in beheading and hostage-taking videos, the apparel has been mainstreamed by both ignorant (and not-so-ignorant) fashion designers, celebrities, and left-wing icons," she said.

    A statement issued Wednesday by Canton, Mass.-based Dunkin' Brands Inc., however, said the scarf had a paisley design, and was selected by a stylist for the advertising shoot.

    "Absolutely no symbolism was intended," the company said.

    Dunkin' spokeswoman Michelle King said the ad appeared on the chain's Web site, as well as other commercial sites.

    Amahl Bishara, an anthropology lecturer at the University of Chicago who specializes in media matters relating to the Middle East, said complaints about the scarf's use in the ad demonstrate misunderstandings of Arab culture and the multiple meanings that symbols can take on depending on someone's perspective.

    "I think that a right-wing blogger making an association between a kaffiyeh and terrorism is just an example of how so much of the complexity of Arab culture has been reduced to a very narrow vision of the Arab world on the part of some people in the U.S.," Bishara said in a phone interview. "Kaffiyehs are worn every day on the street by Palestinians and other people in the Middle East - by people going to work, going to school, taking care of their families, and just trying to keep warm."

    While some extremists and terrorists may wear kaffiyehs, "To reduce their meaning to support for terrorism has a tacit racist tone to it," Bishara said.

    Malkin, in a posting following up on last week's column, said of Dunkin's decision to pull the ad, "It's refreshing to see an American company show sensitivity to the concerns of Americans opposed to Islamic jihad and its apologists."

    Ray, host of the Food Network television program "30 Minute Meals" as well as a syndicated daytime talk show, began appearing in ads for Dunkin' Donuts in March 2007. When Dunkin' announced the partnership, it said Ray would be featured in TV, print, radio and online spots in a campaign running through 2010.
  • edited May 2008
    ..Oh My God. Please tell me that's a joke. For the love of God do not tell me Americans are that bigoted!
  • godgod
    edited May 2008
    This is why I hate America sometimes.
  • edited May 2008
    You know, Hitler wore pants. I hope we all take the appropriate course of action.
  • edited May 2008
    I always knew people who wore scarfs were terrorists. Just look at Harry Potter!
  • edited May 2008
    But The Doctor! He had the scarfiest of scarfs! He was hardly a terrorist!
  • edited May 2008
    That's not the real Doctor. The real Doctor wears a light trenchcoat, a tie, and Converse All-Stars.
  • edited May 2008
    I thought the real one was the one who wore a leather coat and jumper!
  • edited June 2008
    I thought the real Doctor examined you when you're sick, and gave you medicine!
  • edited June 2008
    No, that's a doctor. The Doctor is entirely different.
  • edited June 2008
    And much cooler.

    For example, this is a shot from the latest episode set in the 51st century in an abandoned library. Aren't the keyboards cool?
  • edited June 2008
    Man Sentenced To Prison After Girl's MySpace Page Lies About Age
    ORANGE COUNTy, Fla. -- A 13-year-old girl's sexual shenanigans have put a second man behind bars. Morris Williams, 22, told the judge he thought the girl was 18-years-old, but he found out Tuesday that ignorance is not a defense.

    Morris Williams' mother wailed as he went off to jail. The judge asked for media not to show 13-year-old Alisha Dean's face in court, but her pictures are all over her MySpace page and they portray a sexy, 19-year-old divorced woman.

    "She told me she had just turned 18," Williams said.

    Williams said Dean picked him up on the street and after a few conversations they had sex. When he heard she was not 18, he went to her father.

    "He was like 'well, she's 13,'" Williams said of a conversation with Dean's father.


    Williams said he never did it again, but Dean has done it before with 24-year-old Darwin Mills. Mills was sentenced to five years in prison.

    Dean's father wanted Williams to join Mills there.

    "One of the reasons for the law is the fact that minors have poor judgment," said Jerry Dean, the girl's father.


    Williams' father believes the jail sentence sends the wrong message to Alisha.

    "I guess we just sit back and count how many after this," Henry Smith asked after his step-son was sentenced to jail.

    Dean's family admits Alisha still stays out late and has yet to delete her misleading MySpace page.

    Williams will serve six years probation with the first year in jail. The other five years he will have to wear an ankle monitor. His attorney says he will come back to court to ask again for a shorter sentence.

    I'm against statutory rape as much as the next guy, but this pisses me off.
  • edited June 2008
    You know, he could have tried to get further confirmation of her age. Not very romantic, I'll grant you, but 18-year-olds might have a driver's license, or at least a high school ID, something to indicate they're not in eighth friggin' grade. It's fucked up that she's sent two guys to prison in this manner, but due diligence would have saved them both.

    I wonder if her parents are doing anything to prevent situations like this from reoccurring. Like, anything at all.
  • edited June 2008
    Didn't the guy kinda notice that she was not a 19 year old divorced woman as portrayed in her myspace profile picture when he saw her?
  • edited June 2008
    Well she did tell him she was 18, so he probably already knew the pics were bogus. Still, MySpace ought to take down her account.
  • edited June 2008
    I think the father is pimping her daughter out so he be some Chris Hansen wannabe.
  • edited June 2008
    What Serephel said. Exactly.
  • edited June 2008
    This one is really bad...

    Prosecutor Details Rape That Lasted 19 Hours
    The time crept by so slowly and painfully that the 23-year-old Columbia University journalism student had decided it was time to end her life.

    Over many torturous hours, she had been repeatedly raped, sodomized and forced to perform oral sex, a prosecutor told a jury on Thursday. The accused, Robert A. Williams, 31, had doused the woman’s face and body with boiling water and bleach, forced her to swallow handfuls of pills and to chase them with beer, sealed her mouth with glue, and bound her wrists and legs with shoelaces, cords and duct tape, said the prosecutor, Ann P. Prunty. And now, Ms. Prunty said, he was asking the woman to gouge out her own eyes with a pair of scissors.

    And so the woman, sitting on the floor of her studio apartment in Hamilton Heights and holding a pair of scissors between her knees — the blade pointing toward her face — tried to stop the suffering. She lowered her face to the blade, but turned her head at the last moment, trying to stab herself in the neck instead of her eyes.

    The scissors slipped from her grasp, the suicide attempt failed, and the woman suffered several more hours of torture, Ms. Prunty said.

    The woman survived the nearly 19-hour ordeal, which ended, Ms. Prunty said, when she used a fire started by Mr. Williams to burn the cords that secured her wrists to a futon.

    Mr. Williams went on trial Thursday in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, where he faces 71 criminal counts, including attempted murder, rape, arson and assault. If convicted, he could spend the rest of his life in prison.

    Mr. Williams, who was homeless at the time of his arrest about a week later at the scene of a burglary in Queens, has a lengthy police record dating to his childhood, the authorities have said.

    He was charged in a murder as a juvenile, though the outcome of that case is sealed, a law enforcement official said, and he spent eight years in prison for an attempted-murder conviction in 1996.

    The prosecution began presenting its case with Ms. Prunty’s vivid, step-by-step account of the attack, which she said began about 10 p.m. on April 13, 2007, and lasted until 4 p.m. the following afternoon. Mr. Williams’s lawyer, Arnold J. Levine, did not make an opening statement. Outside the courtroom, Mr. Levine declined to talk about his strategy. In hearings before the trial, he seemed to indicate that he would challenge witnesses’ identification of his client.

    The victim and several witnesses in the six-story apartment building where the woman lived picked out Mr. Williams from lineups, Ms. Prunty said. She said that DNA evidence also linked him to the crime.

    Justice Carol Berkman, who is presiding over the trial, found in October that Mr. Williams was mentally fit for trial. After that decision, Mr. Levine said he was considering a mental illness defense.

    As Ms. Prunty delivered her opening statement, Mr. Williams sat slouched in his chair, with his head tilted downward.

    On the night of the attack, the victim, a month from graduating with a master’s degree, was at Columbia, putting the final touches on her résumé for a job fair the next day, Ms. Prunty said. When she arrived at her apartment building, she got on the elevator and found Mr. Williams inside, Ms. Prunty said. She rode with him to her floor, and could hear him follow her as she navigated the long L-shaped hallway to her apartment.

    As the woman entered her apartment, Ms. Prunty said, Mr. Williams asked her if she knew where a Mrs. Evans lived. The woman stopped to answer.

    “Her kind moment of hesitation would cost her,” Ms. Prunty said.

    Mr. Williams forced his way into the apartment, Ms. Prunty said, put the woman in a chokehold, and slapped her cellphone from her hand. Mr. Williams slammed the door behind him, and “her Friday the 13th nightmare began,” Ms. Prunty said.

    Mr. Williams turned a clock by the woman’s bed to the wall and made her take off her watch so she would not know what time it was, Ms. Prunty said. He raped her repeatedly and cut her hair because “he wanted to see her face, her fear and humiliation.”

    He made her sit in her bathtub, and that was the first time he told her to gouge her eyes, Ms. Prunty said. He punished her for refusing by boiling water in a kettle and throwing it on her, the prosecutor said. The water jolted her so much that she broke through the bonds on her wrist, Ms. Prunty said, as the skin on her chest, torso and thighs blistered. (On hearing this detail, one of the jurors shook his head and covered his mouth.)

    “Just kill me! Just kill me!” the woman pleaded, Ms. Prunty said.

    Later, after her failed attempt to kill herself with the scissors, Mr. Williams threw a heavy object at the back of her head, cracking her skull, Ms. Prunty said.

    Mr. Williams was intent on damaging her vision because, Ms. Prunty said, “a blind witness could never identify her attacker.”

    Mr. Williams eventually slit the woman’s eyelids and face with a butcher knife, Ms. Prunty said, but she did not lose her vision. He fastened her legs and arms to a futon, and she lost consciousness.

    When she awoke, she again pleaded for him to kill her, but heard no response. He was gone.

    Mr. Williams “only stopped when he could no longer feel the scourge of control over another human being,” Ms. Prunty said.

    The woman smelled smoke, Ms. Prunty said, so she wriggled her legs free and pulled the futon away from the wall. She used the fire to free her arms, Ms. Prunty said, and then ran through the smoke to her door. It took her several attempts to open it because her hands were limp and numb, Ms. Prunty said.

    The woman ran through her hallway seeking help, Ms. Prunty said, “an image of the walking, living dead.”
  • edited June 2008
    :( fuck:(
  • edited June 2008
    ... That poor woman :( What's fucked up is if he's ever able to see the light of day again... lock him up and throw away the key!

    I really hope there's someone on Earth who can help that woman try to go back to her everyday life. That's going to haunt her for as long as she lives :(
  • edited June 2008
    Seriously... what a terrible story.
  • edited June 2008

    You'd think that a guy who's preparing to take an oath to defend the US Constitution would have taken the time to actually read the thing.