Spambot Alert!

1235710

Comments

  • edited August 2009
  • edited August 2009
    MARIO THE SPAMBOTS ARE MOCKING US
  • edited August 2009
    Four attacks in an 8 hour period, that has to be a new record
  • edited August 2009
    As they say in Blast Corps, try something else!
  • edited August 2009
    We could certainly use some better defenses. Jakey seems to be spending a fair bit of effort on bot-busting duty.
  • edited August 2009
    Spambots are so lazy these days, it's sad. Before they used to be clever, now they are just kashfaskfasdkfahl. If I'm going to click on spam I'm only going to click on the good stuff from spambots that prove they are interested in me!
  • edited September 2009
    Seems the spambots have evolved... now they're trying to gain our trust by chatting with us before... doing what? I dunno. Kill them with fire.
  • edited September 2009
    That sounds like something an evolved spambot would say.
  • edited September 2009
    Describe in single words only the good things that come intto mind about your mother.
  • edited October 2009
    I saw oo629932 in our list. I knew it'd be a spambot, but I said nothing, and now look what's happened!

    I hate myself :'(
  • edited October 2009
    wtf, klk81966 is up to 20+ posts and is able to make spam threads now.
  • edited October 2009
    They're learning....
  • edited October 2009
    Thank goodness they still fail VK Couple's Testing:

    suspicion.png
  • godgod
    edited October 2009
    I'm not the only one who tried to check the mouse-over text, right?
  • edited November 2009
    Apparently Spambots can now send PMs, I got one today advertising a quick simple way to edit my text. The subject said READ NOW!
  • edited November 2009
    But when is "now"? "Now" from the perspective of the spambot author, who was doubtlessly writing that word long before the message arrived in your PM box? "Now" from the perspective of the spambot itself? "Now" from your perspective, reading the title (although you would still not be able to read the actual message until you clicked on it, rendering the title's demand impossible.)

    Then again, it didn't specify what you should be reading "now". It's quite possible that, through sheer coincidence you were reading something completely different when the spambot was coded, thus satisfying its condition purely by accident. We may never know the truth.
  • edited November 2009
    Arg! I come here and it's nothing but a couple spambots logged on spamming all over everything as I watch.
  • edited November 2009
    ...That's disgusting.
  • edited November 2009
    Long live the king!
  • edited November 2009
    Lipstick32 and doie48904 have been spamming up a storm lately, with sexyl0angel06 looking like it's going to follow.

    Can vBulletin be set up to hold any new user with a number in his/her name for manual approval before granting posting privileges? That would likely cut the spam down quite a bit.

    And I still stand by my recommendation to prevent new users from posting messages containing links. That would cut out nearly all the spambots.
  • edited November 2009
    I've just went back through the last 30 or so new users and banned all of them for being spambots. I'll try and go back even further, it's just a really cumbersome process to ban several accounts one at a time.

    BUT I DO IT BECAUSE I LOVE YOU ALL SO

    send doritos
  • edited November 2009
    You are an inspiration to us all, Jake.
  • edited November 2009
    I said DORITOS NOT ACCOLADES
  • edited November 2009
    You banned Shovel Fulla Waffle?
  • edited November 2009
    I'm currently online with 4 spambots. We really need to do something about this. On slackerz, we used to have a special security field that said Are you human? and in order register, you had to say yes. It kept away vampires and catpeople, too.
  • edited November 2009
    If we implement something like that here we'll have to modify it so that it accepts "Negative, I am a meat popsicle" as a valid answer.
  • edited November 2009
    sdfw532341 is desperate for people to read his blog or something, I dunno. He's spamming though.
  • edited November 2009
    We would also have to accept "or are you dancer?" as a valid response.